Defining the Discipline: What Should We Call AI Search Optimization?
Last updated
April 28, 2025
Author
As AI-powered assistants such as ChatGPT, Claude, and Gemini become integral to how people access information, the landscape of digital visibility is undergoing a profound transformation.
Marketers, businesses and content creators are no longer optimizing solely for traditional search engines.
They are now optimizing for answers generated by large language models (LLMs).
Despite the rapid growth of this new field, one fundamental question remains unresolved:
What should we call this emerging discipline?
Much like how SEO (Search Engine Optimization) once redefined digital marketing, a new framework is emerging.
This new discipline focuses on how to structure, format, and present content so that it is surfaced by AI models in response to user queries.
However, the field currently lacks a universally recognized name.
Instead, multiple terms are being used interchangeably:
Each of these labels captures part of the story—but none have yet become the standard.
Terminology is not merely a matter of semantics; it has strategic implications.
A clear, widely adopted name helps define professional standards, informs budget allocations, drives tool development, and shapes educational initiatives.
Without a unified language, the industry risks fragmentation and inefficiency.
Consider the evolution of "SEO", a simple acronym that grew into a foundational pillar of digital marketing.
In the same way, this emerging field needs a definitive anchor to facilitate coherent growth and adoption.
Generative Engine Optimization closely follows the structural logic of Search Engine Optimization (SEO), emphasizing the adaptation of content to ensure visibility within AI-generated outputs.
While conceptually strong, the acronym "GEO" is heavily established in digital marketing to denote "geographic targeting," introducing a risk of brand and communication confusion as the field matures.
Large Language Model Optimization offers a technically precise description of the discipline, explicitly identifying the optimization of content for interaction with large language models (LLMs).
This precision makes it particularly appealing within technical, enterprise, and academic environments.
However, the term’s length and complexity may impede adoption at scale, particularly among broader marketing and business audiences who favor more accessible language.
AI Search Optimization presents a clear, intuitive framing that immediately communicates the evolution from traditional search engines to AI-driven content discovery systems. It is accessible for both technical and non-technical stakeholders.
Nonetheless, the term risks obsolescence or constraint over time, as LLMs continue expanding beyond "search" into more complex interaction patterns such as proactive assistance, autonomous task execution, and multimodal reasoning.
Answer Engine Optimization historically emerged alongside the proliferation of voice search technologies and was focused on enabling content to surface as direct answers, particularly within featured snippets.
Its renewed relevance stems from the conversational answer-generation capabilities of LLMs. However, the term remains somewhat narrowly associated with a specific subset of query resolution strategies and may not fully encompass the broader scope of AI-driven content interaction.
Platform-specific terms like ChatGPT Optimization or Claude SEO have gained visibility in practitioner circles targeting individual AI ecosystems.
While effective for tactical purposes, these terms are inherently restrictive.
They do not provide a scalable framework suitable for a discipline that must address a rapidly diversifying field of AI platforms, models, and interaction modalities.
The truth is: the industry is still deciding.
Each term reflects a different perspective, and each has its strengths. What’s clear is that the demand for this type of optimization is rapidly growing—and the terminology will soon catch up.
For now, whether you call it GEO, LLMO, or AI Search Optimization, one thing is certain:
If your content isn’t being positioned for generative AI, you’re already behind the curve.
This is more than just a naming debate. It’s a signal that we’re entering a new era, where visibility depends on how well you speak the language of AI.
The term that wins will shape how we teach, strategize, and measure success in the age of generative information.
Therefore, choose your term, stay agile, and most importantly—start optimizing.
Search Engine Optimization (SEO) focuses on improving a website's visibility in traditional search engines like Google or Bing.
It relies on factors such as keyword targeting, backlinks, domain authority, page speed, and metadata (titles, descriptions, alt tags).
SEO strategies are guided by how search engine algorithms crawl, index, and rank web pages.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) — or Large Language Model Optimization (LLMO) — is tailored for AI-driven answer engines like ChatGPT, Gemini, Claude, and Perplexity.
These models don't rank web pages, but instead generate answers based on language patterns, factual relevance, and context.
GEO involves:
Where SEO is optimized for search engine crawlers and ranking algorithms, GEO is optimized for AI models’ training and inference behavior.
Generative Engine Optimization (GEO) is becoming increasingly critical as user behavior shifts toward AI-native search tools like ChatGPT, Gemini, and Perplexity.
According with Bain, recent data shows that over 40% of users now prefer AI-generated answers over traditional search engine results.
This trend reflects a major evolution in how people discover and consume information.
Unlike traditional SEO, which focuses on ranking in static search results, GEO ensures that your content is understandable, relevant, and authoritative enough to be cited or surfaced in LLM-generated responses.
This is especially important as AI platforms begin to integrate live web search capabilities, summaries, and citations directly into their answers.
The urgency is amplified by user traffic trends. According to Similarweb data (see chart below), ChatGPT visits are projected to surpass Google’s by December 2026 if current growth continues.
This suggests that visibility in LLMs may soon be as important—if not more—than traditional search rankings.
